TH
TheJayMann
2011-11-23 03:48 UTC
#2
Dealing damage is only optional if the word “may” is present. Dealing damae to multiple targets is optional only if the word “may” or “up to” is included. Not having the cards in front of me I can not tell you if said cards contain “may” or “up to,” but if they do, then the damage is optional. If they do not, then the damage is not optional.
IM
improvius
2011-11-23 03:56 UTC
#3
I don’t know about that. The official ruling on Tachyon’s Sonic Vortex was that it does not require her to target heroes, and there’s no “may” optional wording on that card.
TH
TheJayMann
2011-11-23 13:30 UTC
#4
Hmm… the official ruling stated that heroes didn’t have to be targeted. And, in the case where the number of non-hero targets is greater than or equal to the number of targets specified by X, then you don’t have to target a hero, unless you so desired. Though, he wasn’t really specific enough as far as if you could choose not to satisfy the entire target count. The question was asked again, more specifically asking about having to satisfy all targets (as the card does not say “up to”) and has not been answered yet. If you don’t have to satisfy the entire target count, then the card is likely a “misprint” or sorts.
CH
Christopher
2011-11-23 14:12 UTC
#5
sneaks in for a second before returning to the card mines
Yeah, Sonic Vortex SHOULD say “up to” for the things it targets. That one is totally a mistake. Whoops. Sorry, guys.
Ok, back to working on cards! Gotta make sure Rook City is perfect and error-free!
>
<<
Don’t tell Adam or Paul I was here!
runs off
TA
Tamar
2011-11-23 14:27 UTC
#6
cracks whip!
Who said you could stop writing and typing and formatting?! Back to work, card monkey!!
WR
WriterRyan
2011-11-23 14:35 UTC
#7
[brandishes banhammer menacingly]
Christopher, I don’t want to have to suspend you from your own forum, but if you don’t get back to work, I’ll do what must be done… 