All CategoriesGamesSentinels of the Multiverse › possible errata on VotM character cards

possible errata on VotM character cards

14 posts · 887 views · started 2016-02-07 01:33 UTC
JF
jffdougan
2016-02-07 01:33 UTC
#1

Citizen Hammer's character card doesn't specify putting the Position card into play, while Sergeant Steel's (and other similar cards) do.

Biomancer's description should arguably be Flesh Molder, not Flesh Moulder. (The former is to shape or mold; the latter is to rot.)

Edit to add: Two extra ones on Greazer's character card.

a) with respect to the card Living Paycheck, it says "put it in play area ...."    (missing the word "the")

b) In his advanced text, the word "themselves" should be "themself"  (singular, not plural).

 

 

I'll add more if/as I catch them while updating the spoiler sheet.

SI
Silverleaf
2016-02-07 01:52 UTC
#2

Mould as a synonym for shape is perfectly correct in British English. ;)

JF
jffdougan
2016-02-07 01:57 UTC
#3

I thought that might be the case, and is why I said "arguably" on that one.

BL
BlueHairedMeerkat
2016-02-07 15:17 UTC
#4

Not true. In recent years, some people have started using themself, but themselves is much older and far more common for both singular and plural.

UN
Under3
2016-02-07 15:36 UTC
#5

The one that stood out to me is on Drudge Ficko’s flavour text where he “drug himself along the hall” in the Court of Blood rather than dragged.

XX
XXVZ
2016-02-07 16:54 UTC
#6

I think that's more just how he speaks, like how other vampires replace w's with v's in other situations. Obviously we don't know for sure, but that's what I got out of it.

JF
jffdougan
2016-02-07 18:10 UTC
#7

TIL. Well, there is a reason I labeled these as "possible" errata,

UN
Under3
2016-02-08 14:14 UTC
#8

Except it’s descriptive text rather than a quote from the character.

VI
VisforYoshi
2016-02-08 15:48 UTC
#9

Well, this isn't me asking for an errata, but this is the most approriate thread to bring it up in.

Does anybody else get bugged by the art in "Gone without a trace" from Madame Mittermier's? Argent Adept didnt leave without a trace, Tempest found his pipes. This probably bugs me more than it should, but am I the only one that it annoys?

TR
Trajector
2016-02-08 18:25 UTC
#10

Ha! That’s a good point, Vis.

LE
LeperKhan
2016-02-09 05:50 UTC
#11

We were definitely talking about this at my gaming group, as well! Silly turn of phrase…

TH
TheCraftyCurler
2016-02-10 06:08 UTC
#12

I caught that, too; however, it's entirely incumbent on what you define as "a trace." You could easily argue that, yes, finding the pipes IS a trace of evidence left by Argent Adept. Personally, I viewed it as, "there is no trace, or path, for them to follow to find him." You know he's missing by the pipes on the ground, but that's it. No other clues, hints, or evidence exists to allow you the means of finding him.

Then again, that could just be my rationalization of the situation to have it all make sense.  

MC
McBehrer
2016-02-10 06:41 UTC
#13

It's without a trace as to how or why he vanished.

VG
Voob_Gooblin
2016-02-10 14:52 UTC
#14

Small thing:

On Plague rat's character card, setup says "put Plague Rat's villain character cards into play," cards pluralized. It's the only one that does that, I think.