GO
Godai
2019-07-23 21:55 UTC
#1
Obviously there are some quasi-NDA considerations, but having someplace we can submit errors, discrepancies, and general feedback would be a good thing, I would think.
Obviously there are some quasi-NDA considerations, but having someplace we can submit errors, discrepancies, and general feedback would be a good thing, I would think.
You could post a comment on the backer-only Kickstarter update.
"Quasinda" sounds like a good name for just about anything. :D
If comments on Kickstarter would be the best route, then maybe a quick, backer-only post of “Leave your copy edit suggestions here”, for consolidation purposes?
Christopher has already noted he collected feedback from the post which shared the previews. So at the moment if you aren’t a playtester the KS backer only posts seem like the best spot to use.
Noted, and thanks for the information!
If you’re not going to use this, I’ve got the name for my next hero.
go4it
Genius rolls a d10 and d6s for archetype. Gadgeteer needs a 17. A genius cannot be a gadgeteer.
This seems odd. I can't help but think a certain Luminary fit both of those.
They can if you do constructed method and not guided.
Still, that's really weird that you would have to FORCE the game to allow you to do that.
I was under the impression that Constructed still had to be possible rolls. Which I was ignoring anyway when it didn’t fit the character- this is just the one that makes the least sense.
Constructed does not require it has to be possible from the dice given st a particular step.
I don’t agree. They gave dice at each step for a particular reason and I doubt it dealt that highly with what wasn’t available at a given step.
I think that has more to do with assigning power dice; a Genius Power Source gives d6s, because -- although they are very smart -- they aren't actually superhuman in any other aspects.
I would be incredibly surprised if they made a conscious decision to specifically lock anyone with Genius out of being a Gadgeteer. INCREDIBLY surprised.